Emergency Response Maps
After 9/11 and Hurricane Katrina, the lack of coordinated information and interoperable communications had tragic consequences. Citizens around the country demanded that government work together to correct otherwise avoidable problems. Most people have heard about two-way radios in the debate over interoperable communications, but fewer realize the important role digital mapping plays in coordinated information and emergency response. Digital mapping of government data, utilities, and infrastructure (collectively referred to as “spatial” or “geospatial” information) has become a cornerstone of information management and communication at all levels of government. However, that spatial information is not yet coordinated across government agencies nor geographical regions. When an electric crew from Indiana helps restore power after an ice storm in Atlanta, GA, the need for coordinated spatial information is great. When a 911 cell phone call from an Illinois roadside gets routed to a dispatch center in Iowa, the need for coordinated spatial information is great. Similar examples of this need are remarkable and nearly limitless.
All Data Are Local
All data are local – and current sources of nation-wide (or world-wide) map data and services typically do not reflect authoritative (local government) sources of what is locally on the ground. Most sources lack vital information in less populated areas. Most sources take months or years with their data update cycles. (A notable exception is the growing openstreetmap.org, though not “authoritative” this “volunteered” map data making is a difference to emergency response around the world). Building a National Spatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI) has been a stated goal of the federal government and many geospatial professionals for over a decade. In those years, many obstacles and delays have prevented the realization of a vision for our nations information infrastructure. An infrastructure that promises to improve the health, safety and welfare of our citizenry, as well as provide more efficient use of tax payer dollars. By and large, technology is no longer the obstacle – it is human. The obstacles reflect a resistance to change and fear of the unknown by policy-makers and stewards of local spatial data (How will this change how we do business? How will it affect the privacy of our citizens? Will it reveal we are doing things “wrong”? How will we fund it? Knowledge is power – will we be giving that up by making our data available to others? Will our own data be used against us?). But there is also danger in complacency of those responsible for building the NSDI. As resistance to change takes a strong hold, the status quo becomes more and more comfortable. Building the NSDI is hard (What if we can’t get cooperation? What if the funding runs short? What if we have technology glitches? How do we keep things running once it is built?). And making the decision to go – not to talk about doing it, but REALLY do it – is difficult. This assertion is not meant to point fingers, rather it is an effort to remind us all of where our challenges lie – sometimes even within ourselves. Institutional inertia is strong and personal risk is real for those who challenge long-standing institutional practices. Those risks, and accompanied inertia, can make the realization of SSDIs and the NSDI even more distant. As we look to our nations future, we must decide if the NSDI is really what we want (do we really want the NSDI, or do we really want to keep doing what we are doing, supporting our satisfied customers, keep a low profile, keep talking about the vision?).
We Just Decided to Go. (you can too)
Several states are taking the reigns and deciding to go by building complimentary Statewide Spatial Data Infrastructures (SSDIs) as a means to get at the NSDI. Organizations like the National States Geographic Information Council are helping to put form on this approach. As in business, there is no real status quo – there is either forward progress or we are slipping. Indiana is one such state that can say “we just decided to go.” Earlier this year, Indiana’s Geographic Information Officer, statewide coordinating council (www.igic.org), and handful of state agencies asked local governments across the state to participate in the IndianaMap (Indiana’s SSDI). The road has been long and not without challenges (e.g., see news stories “Commissioners reluctant to give out mapping information” and follow up story “Commissioners OK state’s mapping request”). But deciding to go has resulted in 28 (of 92) counties signing on to participate within the first 6 months of the request, and over half the state’s population being covered. While difficult, the result is definite progress toward coordinated information and interoperable communications for Indiana.
Those states who have committed to creating their own SSDIs have taken commendable steps to assure forward progress. Without exception it has taken cooperation and strong leadership. Those who just decided to go – let’s do this thing, and get’er done – are making real progress. It would be impossible otherwise.